Yes and we ought to translate Mawlana Anwar-Allah Faruqi’s refutation of Tahdhir Al-Nas All on the to-do list إن شاء الله
@HASSAN Please share on here upon completion and what would also be useful is a similar one for Haji Imdadullah too.
I'm writing a detailed thread against the Deobandi's using just Mawlana Kayranwi Shameless to call him a Deobandi IMOThe Shaykh endorsed the Meccan Grand Mufti’s fatwa against NanotwiHe also attested to Mawlana Qasuris’s entire book against Deobandi headhonchos, Nanotwi, Gangohi, and SaharanpuriIf you want proof for any of the above, just ask 😀 https://t.co/FcebqOy0vu— 🙂 (@has147_) November 23, 2025
Funny little Deo calls Mawlana Rahmat-Allah Kayranwi a Deobandi The legendary book Iẓhār al-Ḥaqq by the Deobandi scholar Shaykh Raḥmatullāh Kīranwī is printed and published by Daʿwah wa al-Irshād, Saudi Arabia in 4 volumes. It is one of the most famous works of recent times refuting Christianity.This is the book that directly inspired… pic.twitter.com/mTExA9AbQ4— Ahnaaf Services (@AhnaafServices) November 23, 2025 Busy right now, but I intend to counter
in the present times, wahabis shouldn't be taken up on polemic discussions on aqidah or fiqh or istighathah. they can be simply asked why they are aligned with the dajjalic yahood against the palestinians. watch them expose themselves as the dajjal-worshippers they are - far worse than the "qubooriyyeen".
Wahabi rejects the miracle of Sayyiduna RasulAllah ﷺ playing with the moon in his crib - says the matn and sanad are both rejected A Barelvi Sufi shrine and tomb pilgrimage merchant, i.e. a charlatan, lies about the Prophet, peace be upon him, claiming that he used to play with the moon at will as a baby.Note: No authentic narration exists regarding this.#Quburiology pic.twitter.com/KXPUCLaFjF— 𝔈𝔟𝔫 ℌ𝔲𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔦𝔫 | حسن شمرانـــي (@EbnHussein1424) October 1, 2025 Matn and Sanad wise rejected.Yes, Sufi majaneen are known to make taqlid of fabrications and khurafat, similar to the Rawarid and their demigod Emoms— 𝔈𝔟𝔫 ℌ𝔲𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔦𝔫 | حسن شمرانـــي (@EbnHussein1424) October 2, 2025 Btw: This Sufi narrated this superstitious folk-religious tale with a sinister motive: if the Prophet, peace be upon him, as a baby could move the moon at will, imagine what he can do now (i.e. respond to the invocations of the Quburis when they call upon him besides Allah). This…— 𝔈𝔟𝔫 ℌ𝔲𝔰𝔰𝔢𝔦𝔫 | حسن شمرانـــي (@EbnHussein1424) October 1, 2025 From Tarikh al-Khulafa
Ibn abdel barr, ibn hazm, and ahmad al ghumari all say that 10s of sahaba preferred imam ‘Ali to sayedina Abu Bakr رضي الله عنهم . Making preference a matter of ‘Aqida is a later political thing. I respect everyone’s opinion but I don’t find this to be binding at all. https://t.co/uuaVUeCVsK— sa3eed (@saeedkhalifeh40) February 7, 2025
Asalam Alaikum brother, can you provide the evidence for this. Ila al-Sunan is considered one of their [deos] "greatest works" in defense of the of the ḥanafī school. If Zafar Thanwi did take this from Malik al-ʿulamā' who is Aʿla Hadhrats khalifa then this would indeed be a major blow to the deos.
Firstly Ila alSunan of "Shaykh" Zafar Ahmad Uthmani Deobandi is taken from the work of hazrat mawlana Zafar ud-din bihari رحمة الله عليه called sahih al-bihari. the author of ila al-sunan admits to that. there are books such as 'Allama Sa'idi رحمة الله عليه 's Sharh Sahih Muslim, Tibyan ul Quran, Ni'mat alBari Sharh Sahih al Bukhari. Mawlana Sharif Kotlawi رحمة الله عليه has a book on Hanafi adillah entitled Arbai'n al Hanafiyya To say 'Barelwis' have no contribution isn't accurate.
Dear brothers I see there is no point in showing link to Wahhabis or salafis... Salafis/wahabis have a problem of takfir (sin) or wrong understanding of aqida but DEOBANDIS have serious issue of belittling or insulting, even the statements of Ismail dehlawi are very derogatory, who uses such language ? These insults take you outside Islam vs takfir (merely a sin) If you ask me I would consider salafis/wahabis thousand times better than DEOBANDIS... DEOBANDIS claim tasawwuf (they talk about wahdat Al wujud) and claim to follow hanafi madhhab yet the statements of Ashraf Ali Thanawi or Ismail Dahlawi are very ridiculous, the way they talk or discuss the issue in a mocking and demeaning way.. Ya shaykh if you disagree, you can politely say I don't agree.. why use defamatory language ???!!!!
https://archive.org/details/ashraful-sawaneh-vol-1-abdul-haq/page/n48/mode/1up pg 45 of book, 49 of file
If I’m not mistaken, was there any statement by one of the Kandhalvis in which he says he’s the biggest wahhabi or something along those lines?
deobandis keep lying shamelessly. every one of them. they will not even examine it and point out where the "distortion" is and what is the correct translation of thanawi, nanotvi, gangohi statements.
in this article, a deobandi maulvi has refuted manzoor nomani's claims and tries to prove that deobandis are anti wahabi. haven't seen the urdu original. apparently it is a translation. On Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab — A Critical Examination of Manzoor Nomani’s View in the Light of the Statements of Ulama-e-Deoband | by Rizwanul Islam | Medium
deobandis have books and opinions for all seasons. if they want to deceive ulama of shaam and egypt, they will present "al-muhannad" and give an impression that they are not wahabis. but they will not tell them that khalil ahmad ambhetvi renounced those positions after wahabis gained power in haramayn. ghatiya qawm. no priniciples. lies, hypocrisy and shamelessness. that is the description of devband. and oh yes, jahl murakkab.
